Unveiling the Clash of Islamists Beliefs and Laws
The contrasts between Western Judeo-Christian biblical beliefs and Islamic law, as outlined in The Little Green Book by Iran’s original Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, expose glaring incompatibilities that are not only an affront but stand in direct opposition to U.S. laws and basic moral codes. On yesterday’s podcast post, we highlighted a few of these Sharia laws, sparking a critical conversation—let’s compare them now, bearing in mind that every devout Muslim is bound to adhere to Sharia over local laws, especially in their “settlement” process. The Supreme Leader of Iran, both Khomeini and the current Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, relentlessly pursues nuclear power and believes it’s his divine right to impose a worldwide Islamic theocratic caliphate.
In Case You Missed It, Watch the Full Podcast Discussion Below.
Watch: #Gavinmandering and Islamists
Thank you for joining us today, folks—we’re diving into some electrifying current topics, and we’re pumped to introduce our new special guest, Steve Klein, a powerhouse expert on the Stealth Jihad in America!
- Jihad and Warfare
- Islamic Law: Mandates armed jihad for all able-bodied men to conquer non-Muslim lands and subdue non-Islamic territories, echoing ancient tribal raiding and Stone Age territorial battles, prioritizing dominance over diplomacy or coexistence.
- Judeo-Christian Belief: Emphasizes peace and voluntary faith (e.g., Matthew 5:9, “Blessed are the peacemakers”), with warfare reserved for defense under divine guidance (e.g., Deuteronomy 20:10, offering peace before battle), rejecting aggressive conquest.
- Ethical and Social Conduct
- Islamic Law: Sanctions taqiyya (deception) to advance Islamic interests, rooted in tribal survival tactics where truth bows to group loyalty, clashing with modern ethical standards.
- Judeo-Christian Belief: Upholds truth and integrity as divine commands (e.g., Exodus 20:16, “You shall not bear false witness”), valuing honesty as a cornerstone of moral conduct.
- Religious Observance and Discipline
- Islamic Law: Demands absolute clerical obedience, mirroring ancient tribal theocracies where spiritual leaders wield unchecked power, suppressing personal conscience.
- Judeo-Christian Belief: Promotes individual conscience and direct relationship with God (e.g., Jeremiah 31:33, internalizing God’s law), rejecting hierarchical domination over faith.
- Women and Gender Roles
- Islamic Law: Prohibits women from leadership and restricts their public role under male guardianship, reflecting patriarchal tribal customs akin to prehistoric clan hierarchies.
- Judeo-Christian Belief: Affirms gender equality in spirit (e.g., Galatians 3:28, “There is neither male nor female”), encouraging women’s leadership (e.g., Deborah in Judges 4) and autonomy.
- Prepubescent Marriage
- Islamic Law: Permits temporary mut’ah contracts and permanent marriages for girls as young as nine, with grandparents’ authority over grandsons, and prefers a girl’s menarche in her husband’s house, embedding child betrothal as a transactional tribal practice.
- Judeo-Christian Belief: Rejects child marriage, emphasizing consent and maturity (e.g., Deuteronomy 22:13-21 ties marriage to adulthood), viewing children as individuals to protect, not commodify.
- Sodomy with Animals
- Islamic Law: Allows sodomy with animals if not equated with human acts, with penalties (animal killing, restitution) for exposure, reflecting a pragmatic rather than ethical stance with no intrinsic ban.
- Judeo-Christian Belief: Condemns bestiality as an abomination (e.g., Leviticus 18:23, “Do not have sexual relations with an animal”), upholding moral purity and legal prohibitions (e.g., 18 U.S.C. § 48).
These stark contrasts reveal Islamic law’s tribal roots versus Judeo-Christian values of peace, truth, equality, and protection, rendering the former incompatible with U.S. law and culture.
Defending Our Republic Against Islamist Theocracy
In the West, particularly the United States, we forged a Representative Republic where authority flows solely from the governed, empowering each citizen to elect their leaders—a stark contrast to the Islamic theocratic caliphate system, where religious leaders dictate as local magistrates. Do not conflate this with any historical Christian theocracy, for the Allah of Islam, who created the sun to set in a muddy spring, the earth as flat, man from semen between backbone and ribs, and the moon as a split light, is not the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and their Islamic Shariah Law is a direct abomination to Biblical laws, especially those safeguarding family values, marriage, honoring women and children (e.g., Galatians 3:28), condemning bestiality (e.g., Leviticus 18:23), prohibiting slavery (e.g., Philemon 1:16), justifying war only in defense (e.g., Matthew 5:9), and establishing government by the people’s consent (e.g., Romans 13:1). When a legal system provides for temporary marriages, what we call prostitution, of prepubescent boys and girls, where men can take 4 women as wives, and countless temporary wives and sex slaves, and still find time to satisfy himself with livestock, the West must force Islamists to return to their Muslim ruled countries and be prevented from poisoning our society.
A brief glance at Sharia law reveals its religious and secular mandates—guiding Muslims in the House of Islam to deceive, shun friendship with, and ultimately enslave, tax, persecute, or kill non-believers (Jews, Christians, Hindus, and non-practicing Muslims) in the House of War, prioritizing clerical obedience. This ideology, incompatible with our constitutional freedoms, demands we stand resolute to protect our Republic from Islamization within our borders.
Share this post